Science Fair or Science Failure


Science FairThe American Science Fair has a long and noble history.  Science Fair programs really began in 1921 with the inauguration of the Science Service, a non-profit company dedicated to helping students explore the scientific method and learn science as an activity.  The Science Fair took its modern form only in 1941, when Science Service went national, and helped to found over 800 science clubs in schools across America – each of which organized and held its own science fair. The original goals of the Science Service organization are still as laudable as they were almost 100 years ago: to introduce students to science as a process and an activity – not as a body of facts to be memorized, to develop better problem solving skills and methods among the students, to allow the student to experience science as an skilled activity that virtually anyone could participate in.  But these goals are no longer served in the modern age by what science fair has become.

Instead of learning science as an activity, today’s science fair often teaches students that science is an ordeal.  While documenting one’s work is essential, the importance of the media has far outstripped the importance of the message; reports and 3-fold posters have become vastly more important in many cases than the originality or scientific validity of the work being presented.

With winners and losers – ego and prestige enter the equation in a big way for both parents and for students.  The validity of work and the experience of doing real science takes a back seat to grades and prizes – and vicarious glory.  As a science fair judge for years, it became easy to see the heavy hand of parent involvement in a student science fair project.  One question was sufficient to detect the student scientist from the student who was really presenting parental work: “Will you please tell me about your science fair project?”  For the enthusiastic young scientist, this unleashes a flood of information while the child presenting the work of others flounders silently to come up with some relevant information.  Sometimes, in a field of hundreds of science fair projects, there might be only a handful of real research science fair projects presented by students who actually performed the science activity they were presenting.  Nowhere is the vast gulf between “I want to!” and “I have to!” more clear.  When we insist on the universality of science fair, we insist that in fact, everyone must be a practicing scientist.  Isn’t this the same mistake we made with No Child Left Behind?

Let’s not abandon Science Fair – it has its place; especially for those talented young people who need such a venue to exhibit their skills.  I simply think that we can avoid the ‘one-size-fits-all’ fallacy this time!  Instead of long, arduous science fair projects that involve many hours of research and culminate in a high-stakes, win or lose situation, let’s offer kids many smaller, shorter science activities that encourage problem solving and creative thinking without the arduous time line.  Projects that can be discussed in one class period, built and tested in two more periods, then evaluated and finally presented to the class.  One week, one project.  Simple, immediate feedback for the budding scientist is what is needed here.  Did your solution to the problem work?  No need to consult a judging panel, Nature decides who wins and who loses, and everyone gains in the experience without the expense and the tremendous investment of time and ego.

Science Fair started out with the intent of offering young people a window into discovery and the adventure of science, a chance to practice the scientific arts and to learn to use the scientific method to solve problems.  We need to return to our roots.  We need to spend our time doing science instead of writing about it.

The Maurice Series is available on Amazon!


About the author -

Dr. Daniel Barth

Dr. Barth is a former research scientist who turned his talents for innovative laboratory work toward teaching science. Dr. Barth was awarded the prestigious 2009 Amgen Award for Excellence in Science Education and he was awarded the “Science is For Kids” Foundation fellowship in 2009. He was recently nominated for the 2010 Presidential Award for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching. You can read his full bio here. You can learn more about Dr. Barth and his Maurice on the Moon curriculum by visting his website, MauriceontheMoon.com. Feel free to email Dr. Barth.


One Response to Science Fair or Science Failure

  1. Tjah says:

    my favorite one is that u can preidct how many apple seeds will be in a certain type of apple. take 3 types of green and 3 types of red then average the totals together and guess how many seeds the 4th type of apple will have like green u could do Gayla Golden delicious and granny smith. and for red you could do red delicious Pink lady and the grocery store will have more.also you could explain y salt dissolves in water y oil does not mix with water,also an easy one explain diffusion take food coloring and 3 cups of water 1st place food coloring in water that is room temp. then boil water and see if it goes any faster. next chill water and see how long it takes for the color to disputes. the last one might be the easiest one to do just take some pics while it is disputing and u will b fine!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Be a better parent, better teacher.
Get our newsletter.

Receive our newsletter every 2 weeks. We never share your information.

Each newsletter contains:

• Q&A with experts in education/learning
• learning tips from experienced educators
• latest developments in education technology